This page has been translated from English

圣经的分析的撒旦史 - 第5部分 - 伊甸园,夏娃的诱惑

圣经的分析的撒旦史 - 第5部分 - 伊甸园,夏娃的诱惑

圣经的分析的撒旦史 - 第5部分 - 伊甸园,夏娃的诱惑

说到敌人的企图以谎言和无知导致缺乏正确的认识有关圣经,这个故事有两个部分没有被覆盖,尽管所有的外观相反。 这将是在伊甸园的诱惑,一开始和结束在火湖里。 会疏忽没有涵盖这些事情,做一个彻底的分析撒旦圣经,所以我包括他们,尽管,作为争议,因为它们是,它可以使这完全难吃大部分基督教。 但我在这里告诉你真相,约圣经的教导,而不是憋信息,因为这是不能接受的许多基督徒。

首先是一些关键信息。
我教过我的网站上,看到我的“以诺书”的视频案件 ,一些所谓的精神的乘法和父亲的精神谱系。 我会引述从那里:

[开始对父亲的精神乘法摘录]

首先神造亚当,

“耶和华神造人[]地面的尘土,生命的气息吹进他的鼻孔,他就成了有灵的活人。”(创2:7)

一旦亚当的身体已经获得了“生命的气息”,那么,他成了有灵的活人。 由此看来,我们可以理解为一个机构,“会呼吸的生命,然后补充说:”给它,结果在新的“活的灵魂”。 在新约圣经“灵魂”这个词在这里澄清,

1哥林多前书15:45“也是这样记着,首先的人亚当成了有灵的活人(心灵),末后的亚当是叫人活的灵(精气)。”

“灵魂”这个词在这里是“心灵”,它的意思是“生命”和“灵魂”。 它也可用于在马特10:28“不要害怕,他们那杀身体,不能杀灵魂的,而是担心他,这是能够摧毁身体和灵魂都在地狱。”但有不同的字用来在哥林多前书15“精神”,这是“元气”。 一个人的灵魂和精神是不同的。

希伯来书4:12, 神的话语是快速,功能强大,和更清晰的比一切两刃的剑,直刺甚至分裂四分五裂的灵魂和精神,骨节与骨髓,[]的心中的思念和主意都能辨明。

“精神”是“生命的呼吸”创2:7中提到的是“精神”,这给生活。 工作中也记载,它是精神,神的气息,这让我们的生活。

“上帝的灵救了我,全能的气息赐给了我生命。”约伯记33:4

“所有的,而我的呼吸是在我里面,神的精神(RUACH)[]在我的鼻孔”伯27:3

因此,我们每个人,我们不能成为一个活的灵魂,直到生命的气息,神的精神,加入到我们的身体。 最初,上帝为亚当的身体呼吸的精神,他成了有灵的活人。 神做同样的前夕,并呼吸到她的精神吗? 不,如不被记录。

“耶和华神使深睡眠落在亚当,他就睡了:他把他的一条肋骨,又把肉合起来,而不是肋骨,耶和华神就采取从人,他 ​​是一个女人,领她到那人跟前。“创2:21-22

也不是它记录了,上帝给了每个孩子的精神概念 - 但我们知道每个孩子,每个人,是一个活的灵魂,所以精神必须被添加的身体,在一些点。 大这个新的研究强调,如果断言,一个一块的精神,神呼吸到亚当被相乘,成为夏娃的精神,同时,神乘以一块亚当的身体,他的一根肋骨,和这成为夏娃的身体。

比较列弗17,创6:3招聘的诗句,它变得清晰的精神是什么赋予生命,生命体在血液中,所以这是不是意味着我们的精神,让生活,被连接到血液中,在血液中,以某种方式。 这是上帝的气息。

“上帝的灵救了我,全能的气息赐给了我生命。”约伯记33:4

“所有的,而我的呼吸是在我里面,神的精神(RUACH)[]在我的鼻孔”伯27:3

“肉体的生命是在血中:我已经给你在祭坛上,使你的灵魂赎罪:[] [血]使人的灵魂赎罪。”利17:11

“耶和华说,我的精神(RUACH)不得永远的男人,他 ​​也[是]肉,然而他的日子是一百二十年。”创6:3

因此,当神造了夏娃亚当的肋骨,肋骨含有血液(排骨含有血液)。 根据圣经,这意味着一些亚当的精神,生命的气息吹进他的上帝,是在肋骨,上帝用亚当夏娃繁衍。 不只是身体,而是神给亚当的精神,乘以1变成了2。 一个身体成了两个,一个精神变成了2,正因为如此,一个活生生的灵魂成为生活的灵魂。

当涉及到儿童,圣经表明相同的乘法过程发生,但带着孩子,二人成为一体(通常情况下)。 我们知道,从身体的母亲和父亲合并,作为儿童身体的遗传学。 然而,当它涉及到生命的气息,精神,使人体成为一个活的灵魂,“圣经”清楚地表明,精神的孩子,给予生命乘以纯粹的精神的孩子的父亲。 这实际上是排序的平衡,因为它是执行所有乘法的儿童的身体在整个孕期母亲的身体。

林前11:8,12“,男人不出去的女人,但女人是男人的,就像女人的男人,以这种方式也是男人通过女人;神一起。“

“耶和华神使深睡眠落在亚当,他就睡了:他把他的一条肋骨,又把肉合起来,而不是肋骨,耶和华神就采取从人,他 ​​是一个女人,领她到那人跟前。“创2:21-22

这里圣经确认,乘以从亚当夏娃一样是全人类的乘法。 它也教孩子从他们的父亲,而是通过他们的母亲。 一个孩子是一个活的灵魂,他的生命本身,给予生命的精神,来自父亲,但孩子乘以通过母亲,有一个身体。 但生活本身的精神,乘以单从孩子的父亲。 没有精神,孩子不会是一个活的灵魂。 这可能是为什么圣经似乎总是指他们的孩子的父亲“父生子(beget),为企业的生命来自父亲。


玛拉基书可以看出,在精神的孩子的父亲是孩子的精神乘以另一个确认。 亚当被称为“残留的精神”,而不是夏娃。

“他没有做一个吗? 然而, 的精神残留 为什么一个? 他可能会寻求一个虔诚的后裔。 所以当谨守你们的心,对他年轻时的妻子,让没有诡诈的。“玛2:15 KJV

因此,寻找亚当和夏娃,怎么乘法的工作,当他们有了孩子? 圣经清楚地传递给他们的孩子从亚当有罪的精神本质,导致死亡。 这使得一个明确的情况下,所有继承的精神死亡和罪恶来乘以从亚当,这是有道理的,如果单靠他的精神传递给他们的孩子。

1林前15:21-22,45“,因为男人死了,男人也来了死人复活。 在亚当里众人都死了,照样,在基督都应当作出活着。 所以写的,第一人亚当,成了有灵的活人,末后的亚当是叫人活的灵。“

罗马书5“因此,正如通过罪是从一人入了世界,死又是从罪和死亡蔓延到所有的人,因为都犯了罪,直到法罪是在世界上,但罪也不算没有律法禁止。 然而死亡统治了从亚当到摩西,甚至超过那些谁没有犯过罪亚当的罪,谁是他来的形像。 但免费的礼物是不喜欢的罪过。 因为,如果一个的罪过都死了,更没有上帝的恩典和赏赐的恩典,一个人,耶稣基督,比比皆是的许多。 礼物是不喜欢说出来,通过一个谁犯了罪;一方面判决源于一个谴责的罪过,但另一方面,免费的礼物源于许多越轨导致理由。 如果一个罪过,死亡通过一个统治,更丰富的恩典和公义的礼物谁收到通过一个统治在生活中,耶稣基督。 那么通过一个罪过导致谴责所有的人,即便如此,通过一个公义的行为,导致所有的人的生活的理由。 对于通过一人的悖逆,众人成为罪人,即使这样的顺从,很多人将义。 法“在这样的罪过会增加,但罪显多,恩典就更显多,如罪作王叫人死,这样一来,即便如此恩典借着义作王永生通过我们的主耶稣基督。

罪恶的本性,通过亚当的精神,因为它是乘以他的所有孩子,使得它不仅是精神,但它的属性,如罪恶或死亡率,传递到孩子。 同样可以看到在防爆,与单独的父亲说传递给孩子的罪过,但作为主说做这个访问,它是不确定的。 是母亲的罪过,“圣经”通常意味着抹杀。

我耶和华你的神是忌邪的神,参观他们的罪孽,自父及子,直到第三和第四代,出20:5 你不可跪拜他们,也为他们提供服务:恨我

诗109:14 愿他祖宗的罪孽被耶和华记念,并让他的母亲的罪过不被涂抹。

再次,工作似乎也印证了神的气息给了他生命,它似乎最有意义的工作是指对自己也有生命的气息,神曾经吹进亚当,本着同样的精神,但经过几代已成倍工作也。 因此,我们每个人都有同样的精神,生命的气息,神曾经吹进亚当,罪性精神死亡,亚当后来收购。

“上帝的灵救了我,全能的气息赐给了我生命。”约伯记33:4

“所有的,而我的呼吸是在我里面,神的精神(RUACH)[]在我的鼻孔”伯27:3

除了正常人乘法,是另一个例子证实了这一点。 耶稣基督是神的独生子,这是同一个词“生”,用于人类男性生儿育女。 耶稣基督的构思是由圣灵,谁是神,平行生命的气息来自精神。 和耶稣基督的灵是神和无罪的,共享的精神属性的父神。 但是,耶稣基督也是永恒的,与神,自己的身体丰满的神性。 “圣经”的教导,他是完全的人,完全的神。 但耶稣基督也是玛丽,一个人类女子的儿子,耶稣基督是人类男子。

约壹5:1“凡信耶稣是基督的神生的:每一个爱他生了,也爱他,他是独生子。”

鹿1:35天使回答说告诉她,圣灵要临到你,功率最高的荫庇你,因此,还神圣的事,须在出生祢必称为神的儿子。

1:2“亚伯拉罕生以撒,以撒生雅各和雅各生犹大和他的弟兄。”

西2:9“,因为在他的居住一切的丰盛,在神的身体。”

当它涉及到耶稣基督的身体......父上帝是个灵,圣灵是精神。 父神是一种精神,他没有肉和骨头制成的身体,耶稣可能是半神的身体在他的身体。 事实上,耶稣基督是“形象无形的上帝”(西1:15)。 所以可以说,耶稣基督是神的唯一的人与身体。 作为永恒的,耶稣是谁,他是在他的身上,一直都是。 耶稣基督是神,并从上方传来,永远存在,创造一切事物(约8:23,8:58,约1)。 圣经的教导,他住丰满的神性,但身体。 但它明确指出,耶稣分担不亚于任何人血肉。 这意味着,耶稣有一个身体,这是完全的人,不亚于任何正常的人类男子的血肉。 “圣经”说,耶稣基督来到肉(约1:7),是一个男人(1蒂姆2:5)。

“上帝是个灵:他们崇拜他必须崇拜他的精神和真理。”约4:24

“你们看我的手,我的脚,这是我自己摸我,看魂无骨无肉,你们看我是有的。”路加福音24:39

“既是孩子们分享的血肉,他也照样亲自参加相同,借着死,败坏那掌死亡的力量,那就是魔鬼”希伯来书2:14

该学说认为,耶稣基督是两个完全的神和完全的人,也被称为“实体联盟”,并没有矛盾。 这种理论同意,耶稣是完全的人,完全的神。 只是想表明这一点。

亚当 - 完全的人

耶稣 - 完全的人,完全的神

人体的生命精神,“上帝的气息”吹进亚当

人体的生命精神,“上帝的呼吸”,同样的事情,吹进亚当,而是重新给定的,第二个亚当。

人类的身体,血肉,神灰尘

人体,血肉 - 基因玛丽,和永恒的存在,因为他是,将永远是从父 - 上帝的形象,身体丰满的神格

生活人类灵魂(思想,意志,情感) - 如神,在神的形象

人类活的灵魂(思想,情绪)

人的身体,灵魂,精神

人的身体,灵魂,精神

(+现在人都能够成为重生的基督徒 - 圣灵,神的精神 - 神领养的孩子 - 但我们也不是永恒的,而不是神)

生于+灵神 - 神的儿子 - 从上面的永恒的未来 - 他也是神

**这个理论描述了耶稣的第二个亚当,我们的精神在我们的血液给予生命乘以从神生命的气息吹进亚当,生活的精神,这是从神所有的圣经。 这个理论可能被认为是一个“灵魂遗传论”的修改和更详细的形式。 就是这样。 这一理论是不提倡异端邪说像Eutychianism Apollinarism,景教,基督一性等,并没有改动耶稣基督的人。**

放在一起圣经所教导的关于人的“乘法”:

1。 父亲的精神,仅是乘以给孩子的身体和生活,使孩子成为一个活的灵魂。

2。 乘以从母亲和父亲,孩子的身体和他们成了有灵的活人(思想,意志,情感)。

3。 父亲的精神精神属性或性质进行乘法的精神,传​​递给孩子。 如亚当的罪和精神的人类死亡,或神的无罪和永恒的国度耶稣基督(是谁/ /将是永恒的)。

现在,如果我们简单地理解圣经所教导的关于乘法和父亲的精神谱系,只是看创6:1-4,多明显变得明显。

“它来传递,当人开始繁殖对地球表面的,他们[]公平的,他们把他们的妻子对他们的女儿出生,神的儿子们看见人的女儿他们选择。 耶和华说,我的灵就不永远力争用男人,他 ​​也[是]肉,然而他的日子是一百二十年。 在那些日子里,有伟人在地上,也是在那之后,当上帝的儿子来见女儿的男子,他们生[儿童],成为[] [勇士]老有名的人。“创6:1-4

罪恶的天使,这些孩子的父亲。 这些罪恶的天使是不朽的精神,并让他们的孩子都将是不朽的精神。 他们是有罪的,所以他们的孩子也将是罪恶和邪恶。 这些孩子的灵魂将是同样的精神,生活,其不朽的有罪天使祖宗。 恰巧,圣经说“神的儿子”式的天使是天使,谁当身体表现,看起来像人类男性的使者类型一样。 它似乎身体乘法,结合人类女性天使谁看起来像人类男性,儿童圣经所说的男人。 他们的精神像那些堕落的天使,但,凡人男子是自己的身体。 然而,圣经记录人体有明显的异常。

这些“伟人”,他有男人的尸体,死亡后,你会成为他们的精神吗? 这是有道理的,就像他们的堕落天使的父亲刚刚从我们所知道的乘法,他们的精神将保持活跃,不朽的,邪恶的,甚至是缺乏身体活跃,不朽和邪恶的,虽然没有一个身体的精神。 只是在寻找的推移,知道“圣经”说,关于乘法,这些巨型的男人会变得明显,有不朽的煞气,将保持活跃,除了有身体。 当我们看到在圣经中的恶魔后,我们就可以知道这是他们的起源和何时以及如何他们来到。

因此,事实上,圣经没有给所需的所有信息获得原产地的恶魔仅仅从神圣的经文。 了解乘法和父亲的精神谱系,它变得明显,这是来自恶魔只是在寻找创6:1-4。 没有圣经以外的来源是需要解释的恶魔来自“圣经”就足以说明这一点。

[结束摘录]

考虑以父亲的精神谱系和倾听,在这个系列的第2部分,然后我说,有一个神秘的出土于第1代和第2代之间的时间休息。 因此,让我们再次看看那。

第一代-2I

让我们的地方第1代和2按时间顺序,考虑到第2代适合里面创1:27。 然后,让我们要特别注意是否有“你”字是单数或复数在希腊。

耶和华神在地面的灰尘形成的人,生命的气息吹进他的鼻孔,他就成了有灵的活人......创2:7

耶和华神吩咐他说:“每一个树的花园(SI)可以随意吃,但不可吃树的知识,善和恶,你(SI),在那一天,你(SI)(SI)也必死。创2:16-17

(请注意,在希伯来文中所有的“你”都是单数)然后,上帝造了夏娃。

耶和华神使深睡眠落在亚当,他就睡了;他把他的一条肋骨,又把肉合起来,在它的地方。 耶和华神就采取从人的肋骨,他制作成一个女人,他 ​​领她到那人跟前。创2:21-22

亚当说:“这是我骨中的骨,肉中的肉,可以称她为女人,因为她是从男人身上取出来的。 因此,人要离开他的父亲和母亲,被加入到他的妻子,二人成为一体。 于是他们都赤身裸体,这名男子和他的妻子,不以为耻。创世记2:23-25

为了女子从神那里听见任何果树,第一个也是唯一的事情是:

然后神就赐福给他们,上帝对他们说,“要生养和繁殖,遍满地面,治理这地;有统治鱼的大海,在空中的鸟,在每一个生命的东西在地球上移动。 神说,“你看,我已经给你(PL)产生种子,这是面对所有的地球上一切的菜蔬, 和一切树上的果实产量种子;(PL),它应为食物此外,走兽的地球,每一个鸟的空气,一切昆虫在地球上,其中有生命,我给每一个绿色药草换食品“和它是如此。创1:28-30 (在希伯来文的“你”是复数)

在这里,我们看到神的人告诉他可以随意吃所有的树木,但也吩咐他不能吃善恶的知识之树,面前的女人。 上帝不会记录为女人相同的命令,上帝给了亚当。 该名女子告诉神,所有的果树已经给他们食物,没有任何异常中提到上帝告诉她什么。 应该指出的神直接告诉她,她已经给每一个水果树吃。

从女人的角度来看:上帝告诉她,她直接可以吃所有的果树,她听见上帝告诉那人他可以吃所有的果树,同时,他们两人一起解决。

不过从男人的角度来看,神告诉他,他可以吃所有的树木,除了一个。 有一棵树,他吩咐不可吃的,如果他这样做,他一定会死。 那人神告诉他和那个女人在一起,他们可以吃所有的果树。

所以,事实上,女人是上帝告诉她被允许从所有果树吃,没有任何异常。 只要让该水槽在第二..... 还好。 然而,亚当和上帝有效隐藏的东西,是一个秘密,他们两个人之间,这是亚当被禁止吃1个水果树,树的知识善恶,亚当会死,特别是“垂死他会死“。

亚当因此,如何处理这个秘密吗? 为了拍摄此,让我们看看接下来的事件,创世记3章:

现在蛇比任何领域的耶和华神所造的兽物更狡猾。 他对女人说,

“”神岂是真说,“(PL)不得吃各样树上的果子园吗?”

女人对蛇说:“我们花园里的树木的果实可以吃,但当中那棵树上的果子,在花园之中,
上帝说,'(PL)不可吃,也须(PL)摸,免得你(PL)死。“(在希伯来文的”你“是复数)

作为神的命令是不能重复的,它似乎很清楚什么上帝对他说,她之前的亚当跟夏娃。 如果我们假设上帝夏娃重复这个命令,那么我们将会把在神的口中的话,加入到“圣经”的话,上帝是不记录发言。 这样的危险。 如果上帝说的话,那么它会被记录下来,而我们必须不加神的话,他是不是曾经说过记录。 因此,我们只能得出结论,从神的话语,我们是为了了解亚当转达神所说的话之前,她的女人。

然而,很明显,这个消息是不准确地传达,因为跳绳有点超前,看着你的单数/复数,它变得清晰,神两次确认后,沦陷后,他原来的命令只有亚当。

耶和华神吩咐他说:“每一个树的花园(SI)可以随意吃,但不可吃树的知识,善和恶, 你(SI),在那一天,你(SI)吃(SI)也必死。创2:16-17

于是他说:“我在花园里听到你的声音,我很害怕,因为我赤身露体,我便藏了。”他说,“谁告诉你(SI)(SI)是赤身露体吗? 3:8-11(SI)你吃了我所吩咐你(SI)(SI)不宜多吃的树?“

然后亚当说:“因为你(SI)听从妻子的话,”她吃树“,其中我所吩咐你们(SI),他说,'你(SI)不得吃':

(在希伯来语所有7这些奇异)

神两次确认,他的命令是给亚当奇,并没有给他们的复数。 三次都被记录在希伯来文中,我们看到这个。 三次都被记录在“圣经”,上帝给了亚当单独命令,一个奇异的紧张,“你”,不是复数紧张的“你”,将显示上帝给了他们两个命令。 上帝直接告诉夏娃,她可以吃所有的树木也被记录下来,上帝告诉她自己。 亚当从来没有收取上帝保佑夏娃吃从树上。 只有上帝吩咐亚当不要吃,但上帝告诉夏娃,她可以吃所有的树木,,亚当知道这个原因,他在那里。

的,所以

1。 因为亚当知道上帝告诉夏娃,她可以吃所有的树木(创1:27-29)

2。 由于除夕已不存在,当上帝给了亚当此命令不能吃

3。 因为神说亚当命令奇异的紧张,并两次证实了这一点

4。 因为最简单的解释,不加的话上帝在圣经中,是亚当跟夏娃有关此命令

5。 因为夏娃的理解显然是不正确的,然而,这是她相信什么

6。 因为“不接触”是一个除了神说亚当告诉夏娃

7。 因为说上帝说,“他们”的时候,他说“你”奇异的,是一个明显的除了神说亚当告诉夏娃约

我的结论是,亚当并没有准确地告诉夏娃神的话语。 他告诉她,超出了这个有一个误解,似乎故意的。 但是,亚当可能不明白他在做什么错,因为他们都喜欢孩子。

最简单和最合乎逻辑的解释是,亚当跟夏娃,尽管神直接告诉她,这是她所有的树木,也有更多的神只有他说,之前,她可以吃。 would die – which was taking away from and adding to God's words and was a lie.他告诉她,神曾表示, 他们不能吃这个一棵树,或他们会死-这是带走并加入神的话是一个谎言。 现在,我不知道谁加入“不触摸”部分的谈话是没有记录的,但有可能是更多的证据的重量,亚当补充此外,比夏娃一样,因为他清楚地做了改变神的话,所以加入“请勿触摸”可以很容易地看到,一起去改变一个奇异的“你”复数“你”。

有证据表明,这是故意的,可以看到在希伯来文,(SI)和(PL)拼写不同,,似乎发音不同,我想请你看看。

which seems to be pronounced “tahell”.这似乎是发音为“tahell”,你会()吃的是奇异 תֹאכַל。

which seems to be pronounced “tahelloo” or “tahelv”.你会吃人(不)是复数 תֹאכְלוּ这似乎是宣告“tahelloo”或“tahelv”的。

因此,继续着他的故事,

蛇对女人说,

“(PL)不一定死。 因为神知道,在一天(PL)吃你的眼(PL)将被打开,你(PL)便如神能知道善恶。“(希伯来文所有的”你“是复数)创3:1-5

所以,当女人见那棵树的果子好食物,也悦人的眼目,一棵树可取的,能使人有智慧,就摘下果子来吃了。 她还介绍了她与她的丈夫,他就吃了。 然后,他们两人的眼睛被打开,他们知道自己是赤身露,便拿无花果树的叶子,并提出自己的覆盖。创3:6-7

注:女人的眼睛不会被记录到已经打开,直到男人吃水果后,“然后他们两人的眼睛都开”,没有提到她和他睁眼之间的时间延迟。

他们听到的声音,耶和华神在花园里散步在凉爽的一天,亚当和他的妻子躲在花园里的树木之间的主神的存在。 耶和华神呼唤亚当对他说,“你是哪里人(SI)?”(希伯来文这个“你”是单数)

于是他说:“我在花园里听到你的声音,我很害怕,因为我赤身露体,我便藏了。”

他说,“谁告诉你(SI)(SI)是赤身露体吗? (SI)你吃了我所吩咐你(SI)(SI)不宜多吃的树?“(在希伯来文中,所有的”你“是单数)创3:8-11

上帝证实,他对亚当说说:“你不应该吃。”

那人说:“你所赐给我,与我的女人,她给我的树,我就吃了。”耶和华神对女人说,“这是你做了吗?”

女人说:“那蛇引诱我,我就吃了。”

So the LORD God said to the serpent: “Because you (pl) have done this, (the “you” here is plural) Gen 3:12-14

The “you” here is plural. As such this “you” seems to be directed at the serpent and the woman. What did they do together? They tempted the man to eat from the tree.

You are cursed more than all cattle, And more than every beast of the field; On your belly you shall go, And you shall eat dust All the days of your life. (the other “you” are singular) And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise His heel.”

To the woman He said:

“Multiply, I will multiply your pains, and your conception in pain you shall bring forth children; Your desire will be for your husband, And he will rule over you.” Gen 3:14-16

(Note: “he will rule over you” is a negative consequence of the fall, which was going to happen because of the fall into sin, spoken to Eve, and not a permission or instruction given to Adam.)

Then to Adam He said, “Because you (si) have heeded the voice of your wife, “she ate from the tree” of which I commanded you (si) , saying, 'You (si) shall not eat of it':

Cursed is the ground for your sake; In toil you shall eat of it All the days of your life. Both thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you, And you shall eat the herb of the field. In the sweat of your face you shall eat bread Till you return to the ground, For out of it you were taken; For dust you are, And to dust you shall return.” (in Hebrew all the “you” are masculine singular) Gen 3:17-19

And Adam called his wife's name Eve, because she was the mother of all living. Also for Adam and his wife the LORD God made tunics of skin, and clothed them. Then the LORD God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, to know good and evil. And now, lest he (si) put out his hand and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever”— therefore the LORD God sent him (si) out of the garden of Eden to till the ground from which he was taken. So He drove out the man ; and He placed cherubim at the east of the garden of Eden, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to guard the way to the tree of life. Gen 3:20-24

Note that the woman is not specifically told that she will die because of eating from the tree, but the man is told he will die because he ate from the tree. If the woman would die because of eating from the tree, what would make sense is that God would have told her she would die for eating from the tree in her punishments. But God does not say that.

Instead the only reason given for her punishment is found in the statement directed to the serpent in the plural “you”. As this you is plural, it seems that God was addressing both the serpent and the woman. It would better read “because you two have done this“. What had the serpent and woman done together? They had tempted the man to eat from the tree. So the most straightforward reading of the text is that what God says to the woman as punishments or consequences are because of her participation with the serpent in tempting the man to eat from the tree that was forbidden to the man, as is specified twice.

Then God forces the man, singular, to leave the garden, for the stated reason to prevent the man, just Adam, from eating of the tree of life. God specifies the man will return to the dust from which he was taken. It is not specified that the woman will die, only that the man will die. Without making any assumption, based just on what God says, it seems implied that if the man dies, then the woman will die also; it's implied as a cause and effect.

All this raises the question, as to whether the woman would have died if only she had eaten the fruit of the tree. Most people seem to think the woman was set to die once she ate from the tree. But is this actually what the Bible teaches?

1。 God commanded the man alone to not eat, and God confirms this twice after they ate.

2。 Adam is told he (singular) will die because he ate.

3。 Eve is never told she will die because she ate, and she was not commanded to not eat. Despite 2 opportunities to confirm she had been commanded not to eat also, God only says that He had singularly commanded the man to not eat, and God twice confirms this is the case.

4。 Apparently God telling the man he (singular) will die implies the woman will die.

5。 The woman's eyes are not recorded as having been opened until after the man ate the fruit, and “Then both of their eyes were opened”

So I think what the Bible actually teaches and is true is that:

The reason the woman died and her eyes did open was because Adam sinned in eating of the tree, and because his eyes were opened from eating. This affected a spiritual change in him, which in turn affected her, because her spirit was multiplied from his . This also would explain why the woman's eyes were not recorded to have opened until after Adam ate of the tree. And this is why all of Adam's children would sin, die, and would have their eyes opened – because their spirits would also be multiplied solely from Adam's.

If the woman alone had eaten of the tree, she would have been unchanged, and not died. And she could not have her eyes opened, a spiritual matter, unless Adam ate, because if she ate she would not know good from evil, from sinning in disobeying God, because it was not a sin for her to eat from the tree. But If Adam ate and his eyes were opened, then it would affect her also, because her spirit was multiplied from Adam's spirit.

If Adam had eaten of the tree and sinned, but she had not eaten of the tree, her eyes would still have been opened, and she still would have died. The same as would her children, because he was their father, and he would be the original of their spirits (giving life), and was the original of her spirit also, as all spirits were multiplied from his.

This is why Adam was commanded to not eat of the tree, but the woman was given no such command, but told by God that it was fine for her to eat. Adam had the original spirit giving life, who all spirits were multiplied from. What he chose to do had power to effect the woman and all the children, real power, and so he carried the responsibility of not eating from the tree.

Both men and woman might balk at the implications of that, but please keep in mind God had a plan from the beginning, within free will, still foreknowing all these things would take place. That plan was Jesus Christ, from the beginning. And what we see here is a picture, symbolic, of Jesus Christ and the church. Jesus Christ, as the second Adam, has never sinned, and His righteousness is imparted to us and covers us, by grace, in His Holy Spirit in us, whether we sin or not, if we are born-again. And we are His Body, His Bride, the Church. Like Adam eating from the tree, Eve and all their children would receive sin into their multiplied spirits. But like Jesus Christ and His Bride, we all receive Grace, and righteousness through faith, from Jesus Christ's sinless perfection, multiplied in God's Holy Spirit. Jesus Christ upholds us, in His perfection, and our imperfections are forgiven. This is the same picture as is seen in Eden, and Paul seemed to understand this mystery and how it worked, writing:

For as in Adam all die, in Christ all shall be made alive – 1 Cor 15:22

Therefore as by the offence of one [judgment came] upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one [the free gift came] upon all men unto justification of life. For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous. Rom 5:18-19

Now, focusing in on the deception, the woman states that the serpent deceived her, not that he “lied” to her. This is also translated as “thoroughly deceived, tricked, or beguiled”. So what was the “deception”? A sort of double entendre, or a double meaning to Satan's words.

Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said to the woman,

“Has God indeed said, 'You (pl) shall not eat of every tree of the garden'?”

And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat the fruit of the trees of the garden; but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden,
God has said, 'You (pl) shall not eat it, nor shall you (pl) touch it, lest you (pl) die.'” (in the Hebrew all the “you” are plural)

And the LORD God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?”

The woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.” Gen 3:12-13

When the serpent said 'you (pl) will not die' Eve made the assumption that Adam had lied about everything he had said, made it all up, and that they both would not die, if either of them ate, as what the serpent told her implied such. This fit what she had heard God tell her directly, that they could both eat from all the fruit trees, so she defaulted back to that.

However, the serpent was deceptive. The serpent said “you (pl) will not die” , but this response was only true if she alone ate. It had a double meaning.

Changing you(plural) to “you both”, let's see how this reads:

Serpent: “Has God indeed said, 'You both shall not eat of every tree of the garden'?”

Eve: “God has said, 'You both shall not eat it, nor shall you both touch it, lest you both die.'”

Serpent: You both will not surely die.

God knows that in the day you both eat of it, both of your eyes will be opened, and you both will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

What is the “deception” here? In his answer to the woman, the serpent is negating her claim that if they both eat or touch, they will both die. IE浏览器。 “You BOTH will not die” What the serpent said could be taken 2 ways, one of which was true and the other which was false. The truth was that they both would not die if she ate or touched the fruit. But they both would die if Adam ate the fruit.

What Eve understood by “you both will not die” was “if either of you eat, that individual will not die.” In fact, what the serpent said was that it was not true that they would both die if EITHER one of them ate, or touched it, implying if the one was her. The second meaning possible, which the serpent left out specifying, leaving it vague, was that they both would die if Adam ate, and neither one would die if she ate. And the serpent followed this with a simple statement, which was true in itself, that if they both ate of it that both their eyes would be open, like gods, knowing good and evil. In this combination of a double meaninged statement, the first sentence, plus a true statement, the second sentence, the serpent misled her, pointing her in the wrong direction. And that is how the serpent deceived her.

Eve must have later understood that the serpent tricked her, as there was a double meaning to his words, his first sentence, and she had understood the wrong meaning. She thought he meant that neither would die if either one of them ate. We know this because she states that he “deceived” her. Not that he “lied” to her. The deception, in context, is that what the serpent said was partially true, and had a double meaning.

And so this is how what the serpent said was a deception, not a just a blatant lie. What happened here was NOT that the serpent spoke a lie and the woman believed him. She was, in fact, thoroughly deceived, by the double-meaning of the words the serpent chose.

And what set her up for this was that Adam had not told her God's words correctly. If she had known Adam alone could not eat, this would have been in harmony with God directly telling her that they both could eat freely of the fruit trees. But because Adam lied to her, and it contradicted what she heard God say, she defaulted to thinking he had been lying entirely, made it all up, when the serpent deceived her. If Adam had told her correctly what God's Words were that were said to him, then the serpent, Satan, would not have been able to deceive Eve, because there would have been no weak spot to attack. But as soon as she touched the fruit, which was allowed for her by God, and saw she did not die, she believed Adam had lied, and when she ate it and did not die, she knew Adam had lied, and thought it was safe, and then she thought Adam had made it all up, and the serpent was telling the truth, because it matched what God told her. She thought Adam was foolish, unwise, to have lied to her, and so thought he needed wisdom – so she gave him the fruit, believing it was safe for him to eat.

If you understand how complicated all of this actually was, it becomes clear that the woman was thoroughly deceived by a very intelligent deceiver, Satan. She really was thoroughly deceived, not just lied to, as 1 Tim 2:14 and 2 Cor 11:3 also confirm,

“And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived became in the transgression(singular)” . 1 Tim 2:14

“But I am afraid that, as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness , your minds will be led astray from the simplicity and purity of devotion to Christ.” 2 Cor 11:3

Another question is did Adam understand what the serpent actually meant? Yes, as “Adam was not deceived” (1Tim2:14), it seems likely that he did understand. Adam understood that the serpent meant she would not die if she ate, but rather that just Adam would die if he ate. And so what would seem to be the likely reason Adam said and did nothing as the serpent deceived the woman? Because if he spoke up to contradict the serpent, he was going to have to admit that he lied to the woman. He could not contradict the serpent's statement without getting caught in his own lie to the woman. This seems the most likely reason he said and did nothing. If it had been a misunderstanding, and she had misunderstood what Adam told her, then Adam could have spoken up to easily correct it. That Adam did not speak up is an important piece of evidence that Adam's lie to the woman was intentional, and done knowingly, which he was fully aware of, and not a misunderstanding. Again “Adam was not deceived” . And rather than admit to lying, Adam decided to knowingly eat from a tree God had said would kill him, and as Adam was not deceived, he did this believing it would kill him, and he would die. He would rather have killed himself, than to admit to lying to the woman about what he told her. IF it was a simple misunderstanding, then why, not being deceived, knowingly kill himself? We can still see this trait in people today, that sometimes people would rather die or hurt themselves, than to admit that they lied, or made a mistake. I believe we call that pride. However, it seems very likely that Adam did not know that Eve also would die if he ate, but rather only thought that he would die if he ate. See man, like the woman, was never meant to carry the load of never eating from the tree – men may look a little more like Jesus Christ than women do, though both genders do look human like Jesus does (made in the image of God), but no other man is Jesus Christ, is God, and able to carry the burden, like only God can and does, of being sinless and perfect, forevermore, never eating from that tree, even if we do at times.

Understanding what happened in Eden is important in understanding later passages of Scripture, especially 1 Tim 2:11-14. With a fresh look at the Greek, using the oldest known manuscript of the text, the Codex Sinaiticus, it reads:

A woman in quietness, you must have her learn in all subjection, to teach.

But the woman I allow not never to be-one-who-with-her-own-hand-kills the man, but to be in quietness. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived became in the transgression.

This says that a woman must learn first, before she teaches, in order to teach. In context, Paul is referencing to the sort of woman who is quiet and does her own work, sitting under a teacher, and learning the scriptures, before she teaches, ie learning God's Word before teaching it. This was especially pertinent at the time because women needed to catch up to the men, many not having been taught the scriptures. Paul also makes the statement that he never ever allows a woman to become someone who “with her own hand kills another or herself” – but instead, to be in a quiet state of learning. Ie learning God's true Word, before teaching another. This “not never allow” is a double negative negation in the Greek, and stresses emphasis here that Paul never allows this to happen. Paul illustrates the principle of learning God's true Word, before teaching another, through referencing the story of Adam and Eve, which Paul understood. Namely that because of not being taught God's true Words by Adam, that Eve was able to be deceived by the serpent, and that led to Adam sinning, and Eve becoming “in the transgression” ie taking part in the 1 transgression, sin, of Adam eating the fruit.
Paul doesn't blame Eve here, but rather emphasizes that he, Paul, never allows a woman to be put in that situation, because Paul teaches her God's true Words – God's Words – and cites what happened in Eden, and firmly sets himself as an example for Timothy, that Timothy must (imperative) have her learn, before she teaches. That's what this passage actually says and means. This passage says nothing about women not being allowed to teach men, nothing about usurping men's authority by teaching, etc. etc. It just says that women need to learn the scriptures before teaching, and places responsibility for this on the church leadership, which is easily applicable to both men and women, that either one must learn the scriptures before teaching them, but just women are emphasized here because they were behind in scriptural education, at the time.

And this references well back to Paul's student Priscilla, who he led to Christ, and taught her and her husband, and they both later taught Apollos. Paul himself taught a woman, and Acts recognizes this same woman taught Apollos, and there is no problem mentioned with any of this. In this story, it is in fact very clear that the Bible says it is fine for a woman to teach a man, and in this case her actions were part of how he was led to salvation in Jesus Christ. (Acts 18:2-4, 24-26)

We are living in dark times of ignorance in the church, still, today. And it seems that the serpent still hates the woman, and is still persecuting her seed to this day, in doing everything he can to affect ignorance in the church, against women, among many other crimes against women in the world today. For a more thorough explanation, bible studies and analysis, on this and other topics related to gender in the Bible, see my book “Understanding Biblical Gender Equality” which is free to read online at WalkInTruth.net .

A Modern Guide to Demons and Fallen Angels © 2007-2013
Paradox Brown

提交评论

您的电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已被标记为*

9,060 Spam Comments Blocked so far by Spam Free Wordpress

HTML标签都是不允许的。